Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 23:50:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25EF7F8B25AA91E33EEEB7627BE31DCD802C65CDB62CD9D386FE997DC806C285
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note de contexte : Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable, il s'agit d'un tabloïd connu pour son sensationnalisme, son manque de vérification des informations et la publication de nouvelles fausses ou volontairement polémiques. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819519968217591945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25EF7F8B25AA91E33EEEB7627BE31DCD802C65CDB62CD9D386FE997DC806C285
  • createdAtMillis - 1722642653212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181951996821759194525EF7F8B25AA91E33EEEB7627BE31DCD802C65CDB62CD9D386FE997DC806C285