Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-10 10:11:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not sure CN is feasible or appropriate for long documentary pieces. The back-and-forth structure of reply threads is more effective for disputing out the facts when so many are making up the content itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819463356719550515
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1725963099866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819463356719550515F517519C1C0A2897B6C5B1822C814840C839C38CE2DB26E5FED61FCF77B3ED6D