Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 20:40:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADD07B7DC6BE18D3A93E64E1D7F71CDF9151CCFB10FB909A0DF31106E6EF3828
Participant Details

Original Note:

OF COURSE, "Profound Grass Woodpecker" uses AN EXCEPTION to try and refute a general claim. The post is correct. Women do NOT have XY chromosomes. Malformations and exceptions are not valid arguments to refute a claim directed at the generality of healthy humans. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819437512391008322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADD07B7DC6BE18D3A93E64E1D7F71CDF9151CCFB10FB909A0DF31106E6EF3828
  • createdAtMillis - 1722717635371
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819437512391008322ADD07B7DC6BE18D3A93E64E1D7F71CDF9151CCFB10FB909A0DF31106E6EF3828