Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 19:33:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03767172B4C79B5AE996D434E950C614630323963C7E43058BC1EAA8E5A2D9F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

OF COURSE, "Profound Grass Woodpecker" uses AN EXCEPTION to try and refute a general claim. The post is correct. Women do NOT have XY chromosomes. Malformations and exceptions are not valid arguments to refute a claim directed at the generality of healthy humans. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819437512391008322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03767172B4C79B5AE996D434E950C614630323963C7E43058BC1EAA8E5A2D9F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722627188322
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181943751239100832203767172B4C79B5AE996D434E950C614630323963C7E43058BC1EAA8E5A2D9F0