Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 18:04:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7194215FA6F86D460B2B0450205E7F7C8EA20FE5888F9F586B76D4E4E4F9418
Participant Details

Original Note:

Please be aware that the ICJ state that their ruling is advisory only - read the whole ruling here - https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-pre-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819423730008781170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7194215FA6F86D460B2B0450205E7F7C8EA20FE5888F9F586B76D4E4E4F9418
  • createdAtMillis - 1722708272685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819423730008781170E7194215FA6F86D460B2B0450205E7F7C8EA20FE5888F9F586B76D4E4E4F9418