Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 20:44:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61831C1744C8DEBD32FB97B2CB5FD212CB8D0223F4BB60F380D6715A6D79DBC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Please be aware that the ICJ state that their ruling is advisory only - read the whole ruling here - https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-pre-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819423730008781170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61831C1744C8DEBD32FB97B2CB5FD212CB8D0223F4BB60F380D6715A6D79DBC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1722631495661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 181942373000878117061831C1744C8DEBD32FB97B2CB5FD212CB8D0223F4BB60F380D6715A6D79DBC9