Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 18:55:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DB250C57FD7CCF8CEE1DE593809D6AD4E66D9CB093063172AE6FF863B0DBAC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's almost impressive - I think the proposed note by Generous Rhubarb Stilt is possibly the first note I've seen to tick every single rejection reason simultaneously.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819404835533279336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9DB250C57FD7CCF8CEE1DE593809D6AD4E66D9CB093063172AE6FF863B0DBAC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1722624924199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18194048355332793369DB250C57FD7CCF8CEE1DE593809D6AD4E66D9CB093063172AE6FF863B0DBAC4