Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 04:47:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0F085679332BAA042109D2DB6C0DAB0CE4D57194C0519D89B1D79DD8FE152DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the guardian is not a reputable source, and the sources cited in the article aren’t reputable either

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819388060997493034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0F085679332BAA042109D2DB6C0DAB0CE4D57194C0519D89B1D79DD8FE152DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1722660474187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819388060997493034B0F085679332BAA042109D2DB6C0DAB0CE4D57194C0519D89B1D79DD8FE152DF