Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 00:19:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AF6950D0DBA6DD12912770703DD2CC08EBF4B1572905CF4437FAE0927864F9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the guardian is not a reputable source, and the sources cited in the article aren’t reputable either

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819388060997493034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AF6950D0DBA6DD12912770703DD2CC08EBF4B1572905CF4437FAE0927864F9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722644361509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18193880609974930343AF6950D0DBA6DD12912770703DD2CC08EBF4B1572905CF4437FAE0927864F9C