Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 02:03:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3879B5DBBBDF75AB9ECF4F86E08AF66FA00E5916AF4E79BBB5DA10614E16B2DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the guardian is not a reputable source, and the sources cited in the article aren’t reputable either

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819388060997493034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3879B5DBBBDF75AB9ECF4F86E08AF66FA00E5916AF4E79BBB5DA10614E16B2DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1722650625370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18193880609974930343879B5DBBBDF75AB9ECF4F86E08AF66FA00E5916AF4E79BBB5DA10614E16B2DE