Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 06:37:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EFFD19D18DA2B2DF58A52A7FEC8D90636A7D049921E2FF82FB6F5BFBB5F3F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the guardian is not a reputable source, and the sources cited in the article aren’t reputable either

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819388060997493034
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EFFD19D18DA2B2DF58A52A7FEC8D90636A7D049921E2FF82FB6F5BFBB5F3F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1722667051791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18193880609974930341EFFD19D18DA2B2DF58A52A7FEC8D90636A7D049921E2FF82FB6F5BFBB5F3F9A