Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 04:17:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0CADEED021AAC38BE7F7495BE3603BB2CBC0784ABB472A66F9A952B75342E4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5th Circuit did indeed make this ruling in September of last year: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/08/5th-circuit-ruling-covid-content-moderation/ However, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling in June: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/26/supreme-court-social-media-white-house/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1819207723319546073
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E0CADEED021AAC38BE7F7495BE3603BB2CBC0784ABB472A66F9A952B75342E4D
createdAtMillis - 1722572226565
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1819207723319546073E0CADEED021AAC38BE7F7495BE3603BB2CBC0784ABB472A66F9A952B75342E4D