Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 04:11:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 430D38669512B37C3527879F49B8F423285E7AB0C70015AF0350CE1D460C5B76
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5th Circuit did indeed make this ruling in September of last year: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/08/5th-circuit-ruling-covid-content-moderation/ However, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling in June: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/26/supreme-court-social-media-white-house/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819207723319546073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 430D38669512B37C3527879F49B8F423285E7AB0C70015AF0350CE1D460C5B76
  • createdAtMillis - 1722571877178
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819207723319546073430D38669512B37C3527879F49B8F423285E7AB0C70015AF0350CE1D460C5B76