Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 08:16:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEC84EBBC8622860F2C43F17002392CAFFB29D43959D34615409C73578AE8B22
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is not contradicted by anything in the tweet, and it also misrepresents what the linked Slate article says. It doesn't "report" why she called the IBA test, it simply guesses as to what the IBA was inferring. https://slate.com/culture/2024/08/olympic-boxers-gender-test-controversy-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819201507490779559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEC84EBBC8622860F2C43F17002392CAFFB29D43959D34615409C73578AE8B22
  • createdAtMillis - 1722586579972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819201507490779559BEC84EBBC8622860F2C43F17002392CAFFB29D43959D34615409C73578AE8B22