Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 03:42:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0ECADDA15BA94020D20D6310CC11B6F1CA067AAEACD0DE91D864FB6EE4573B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is not contradicted by anything in the tweet, and it also misrepresents what the linked Slate article says. It doesn't "report" why she called the IBA test, it simply guesses as to what the IBA was inferring. https://slate.com/culture/2024/08/olympic-boxers-gender-test-controversy-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819201507490779559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0ECADDA15BA94020D20D6310CC11B6F1CA067AAEACD0DE91D864FB6EE4573B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1722570169512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819201507490779559B0ECADDA15BA94020D20D6310CC11B6F1CA067AAEACD0DE91D864FB6EE4573B3