Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 16:58:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ABFADEEE198131212CD5B5072EB29A031BAB56E410C24FF5522F1F38FCF87176
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is not contradicted by anything in the tweet, and it also misrepresents what the linked Slate article says. It doesn't "report" why she called the IBA test, it simply guesses as to what the IBA was inferring. https://slate.com/culture/2024/08/olympic-boxers-gender-test-controversy-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819201507490779559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ABFADEEE198131212CD5B5072EB29A031BAB56E410C24FF5522F1F38FCF87176
  • createdAtMillis - 1722704334552
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819201507490779559ABFADEEE198131212CD5B5072EB29A031BAB56E410C24FF5522F1F38FCF87176