Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 22:34:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C1174111F043E42512990B2076F67927AB98729E5202B1358C5449E2017C7B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is not contradicted by anything in the tweet, and it also misrepresents what the linked Slate article says. It doesn't "report" why she called the IBA test, it simply guesses as to what the IBA was inferring. https://slate.com/culture/2024/08/olympic-boxers-gender-test-controversy-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819201507490779559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C1174111F043E42512990B2076F67927AB98729E5202B1358C5449E2017C7B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722638063396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18192015074907795599C1174111F043E42512990B2076F67927AB98729E5202B1358C5449E2017C7B0