Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 03:04:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 516FE32592699D393441750B1C724E4690C84C632A726DC13141F97B02F46A25
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is not contradicted by anything in the tweet, and it also misrepresents what the linked Slate article says. It doesn't "report" why she called the IBA test, it simply guesses as to what the IBA was inferring. https://slate.com/culture/2024/08/olympic-boxers-gender-test-controversy-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819201507490779559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 516FE32592699D393441750B1C724E4690C84C632A726DC13141F97B02F46A25
  • createdAtMillis - 1722567878609
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819201507490779559516FE32592699D393441750B1C724E4690C84C632A726DC13141F97B02F46A25