Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 14:45:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4488D9B19698F0ADBC3C757B04A99FDF0D313E0D2B3238CC35C9E7E1D134A5A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court never said it was “okay”. They said the law cited didn’t apply in this case. “No matter how compelling Pittman’s argument may be & no matter how sympathetic this court … may be to Pittman’s situation, we are bound by the state of the law as it currently exists” https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article42018276.html#storylink=cpy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819191573009113401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4488D9B19698F0ADBC3C757B04A99FDF0D313E0D2B3238CC35C9E7E1D134A5A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1722609930160
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18191915730091134014488D9B19698F0ADBC3C757B04A99FDF0D313E0D2B3238CC35C9E7E1D134A5A3