Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 18:18:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Despite an obvious lack of sources there is no proof that a) this post is a joke b) this is a satirical account or c) this is a "fake" journalist. Most journalism is centred in speculation. Leave any arguments to the contrary to the comments and/or quotes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819001411633607131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754
  • createdAtMillis - 1722622735495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181900141163360713126DF64FC53A46900122DBF39F2976FFCEA6F3E23844073BEECE8F8F7E1B8B754