Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 16:08:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85972D0C5B131F936ECE51A23E22414FAB5C4790F71A48608DB17AC183C77E74
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que no se le condenase por prevaricación, como recoge la sentencia en su contra. https://laadministracionaldia.inap.es/noticia.asp?id=1056576

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819000561242439968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85972D0C5B131F936ECE51A23E22414FAB5C4790F71A48608DB17AC183C77E74
  • createdAtMillis - 1722528532407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181900056124243996885972D0C5B131F936ECE51A23E22414FAB5C4790F71A48608DB17AC183C77E74