Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 17:19:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1709293CB9F626CE8B63C8AFC1F24AF3C1B97463F23C934E3F05A9DA0AA349E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Non seulement il s’agit uniquement de l’opinion d’un invité, mais en plus (on ne le répétera jamais assez), Wikipedia est très loin d’être une source fiable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818952762542993915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1709293CB9F626CE8B63C8AFC1F24AF3C1B97463F23C934E3F05A9DA0AA349E
  • createdAtMillis - 1722532763660
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818952762542993915A1709293CB9F626CE8B63C8AFC1F24AF3C1B97463F23C934E3F05A9DA0AA349E