Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 13:00:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7619CE451158CACF81F0A1B9B026B97A65488485E4F55B45B89E212651FA77D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Non seulement il s’agit uniquement de l’opinion d’un invité, mais en plus (on ne le répétera jamais assez), Wikipedia est très loin d’être une source fiable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818952762542993915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7619CE451158CACF81F0A1B9B026B97A65488485E4F55B45B89E212651FA77D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722517202917
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189527625429939157619CE451158CACF81F0A1B9B026B97A65488485E4F55B45B89E212651FA77D0