Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 14:53:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 199FD4CB9ED1B05048ACBAEE674F3D1A181723A5FBC6BB5F7AFEFD4D2E3F3D2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Non seulement il s’agit uniquement de l’opinion d’un invité, mais en plus (on ne le répétera jamais assez), Wikipedia est très loin d’être une source fiable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818952762542993915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 199FD4CB9ED1B05048ACBAEE674F3D1A181723A5FBC6BB5F7AFEFD4D2E3F3D2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722524022664
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818952762542993915199FD4CB9ED1B05048ACBAEE674F3D1A181723A5FBC6BB5F7AFEFD4D2E3F3D2F