Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 10:29:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 008967A02A6172F5ADD9D9BC1E8B014C506A302BC51C4E9F9FE38448BFBCDDAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Non seulement il s’agit uniquement de l’opinion d’un invité, mais en plus (on ne le répétera jamais assez), Wikipedia est très loin d’être une source fiable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818952762542993915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 008967A02A6172F5ADD9D9BC1E8B014C506A302BC51C4E9F9FE38448BFBCDDAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1722508166111
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818952762542993915008967A02A6172F5ADD9D9BC1E8B014C506A302BC51C4E9F9FE38448BFBCDDAE