Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 17:15:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0049B92C39035C883BB70DE143A40653A920C62A23C21D5D69BD6DAA1C3035C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Non seulement il s’agit uniquement de l’opinion d’un invité, mais en plus (on ne le répétera jamais assez), Wikipedia est très loin d’être une source fiable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818952762542993915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0049B92C39035C883BB70DE143A40653A920C62A23C21D5D69BD6DAA1C3035C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1722532557033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189527625429939150049B92C39035C883BB70DE143A40653A920C62A23C21D5D69BD6DAA1C3035C9