Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 14:01:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 877B332D53814EE141DFAC3D4FEF1726F8E3E8986462C56196924F087D3BFD6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note refers to Barr's article, where he directly states that an ethics code could be used against conservative judges specifically. An obvious implication is that conservative judges are unable to follow such a code. Other interpretations can be shared in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818916624227090630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 877B332D53814EE141DFAC3D4FEF1726F8E3E8986462C56196924F087D3BFD6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1722607300138
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818916624227090630877B332D53814EE141DFAC3D4FEF1726F8E3E8986462C56196924F087D3BFD6B