Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 15:21:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EA8E743377D4AF5246D7944AABB5A9B7D7319BE3F5F6F3D0567AD36D0EB9BCF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note refers to Barr's article, where he directly states that an ethics code could be used against conservative judges specifically. An obvious implication is that conservative judges are unable to follow such a code. Other interpretations can be shared in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818916624227090630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EA8E743377D4AF5246D7944AABB5A9B7D7319BE3F5F6F3D0567AD36D0EB9BCF
  • createdAtMillis - 1722525715028
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189166242270906304EA8E743377D4AF5246D7944AABB5A9B7D7319BE3F5F6F3D0567AD36D0EB9BCF