Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 12:41:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A9C16235563655D07DA1A4024E5CD01EC0D9B4A82871753CFFD02F4395E5A2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note refers to Barr's article, where he directly states that an ethics code could be used against conservative judges specifically. An obvious implication is that conservative judges are unable to follow such a code. Other interpretations can be shared in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818916624227090630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A9C16235563655D07DA1A4024E5CD01EC0D9B4A82871753CFFD02F4395E5A2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722602485272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189166242270906302A9C16235563655D07DA1A4024E5CD01EC0D9B4A82871753CFFD02F4395E5A2C