Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 04:26:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2600512C0F828893E25E205943969AAB1EEBC63B2FFF9E34A6B168903527EA31
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note refers to Barr's article, where he directly states that an ethics code could be used against conservative judges specifically. An obvious implication is that conservative judges are unable to follow such a code. Other interpretations can be shared in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818916624227090630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2600512C0F828893E25E205943969AAB1EEBC63B2FFF9E34A6B168903527EA31
  • createdAtMillis - 1722572804224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189166242270906302600512C0F828893E25E205943969AAB1EEBC63B2FFF9E34A6B168903527EA31