Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 02:50:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F4D8EADE1DFD42C6608EDE01460E2424A774F1DADFC4065281B9E799A525CC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note refers to Barr's article, where he directly states that an ethics code could be used against conservative judges specifically. An obvious implication is that conservative judges are unable to follow such a code. Other interpretations can be shared in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818916624227090630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F4D8EADE1DFD42C6608EDE01460E2424A774F1DADFC4065281B9E799A525CC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1722567019018
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18189166242270906301F4D8EADE1DFD42C6608EDE01460E2424A774F1DADFC4065281B9E799A525CC4