Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 04:19:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - El comunicado nunca menciona que el hecho de reunir las "condiciones regulatorias y fiscales" sea el motivo por el cual se prefirió Rio Negro por sobre Buenos Aires. En cambio sí se explica que la decisión no cambiaría aún si ambas provincias reunieran iguales condiciones.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818848705312690449
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1722485977371
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818848705312690449F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5