Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 17:22:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A47275FE208C7BC635BF34D13FE63B71F10ABCE588FF0F36859C54248EC5DACA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the video is exploiting the daughter by simply including her in it has no merit. The insinuation that her outfit is provocative is both sexist and sexualizes a minor for wearing clothes that are not inherently sexual and are considered age appropriate. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/girls-against-dress-codes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818841192538554579
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A47275FE208C7BC635BF34D13FE63B71F10ABCE588FF0F36859C54248EC5DACA
  • createdAtMillis - 1722705766669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818841192538554579A47275FE208C7BC635BF34D13FE63B71F10ABCE588FF0F36859C54248EC5DACA