Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 21:06:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 767899A063168A8243B6EE74F6AA0FC9D472CDD2EA7CFB6843B5C73516C3AF4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the video is exploiting the daughter by simply including her in it has no merit. The insinuation that her outfit is provocative is both sexist and sexualizes a minor for wearing clothes that are not inherently sexual and are considered age appropriate. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/girls-against-dress-codes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1818841192538554579
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 767899A063168A8243B6EE74F6AA0FC9D472CDD2EA7CFB6843B5C73516C3AF4C
createdAtMillis - 1722546395718
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1818841192538554579767899A063168A8243B6EE74F6AA0FC9D472CDD2EA7CFB6843B5C73516C3AF4C