Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 17:30:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FA5DC58E59775A66C41C002635BA8EE4B858979A80ADAF45311BC15042E3976
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the video is exploiting the daughter by simply including her in it has no merit. The insinuation that her outfit is provocative is both sexist and sexualizes a minor for wearing clothes that are not inherently sexual and are considered age appropriate. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/girls-against-dress-codes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1818841192538554579
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1FA5DC58E59775A66C41C002635BA8EE4B858979A80ADAF45311BC15042E3976
createdAtMillis - 1722533442319
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18188411925385545791FA5DC58E59775A66C41C002635BA8EE4B858979A80ADAF45311BC15042E3976