Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 13:54:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DE0E2D482AD28A65E4E7D4F9C2E7AE532E9FBFF641D4EFA387D1739459D6A73
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that the video is exploiting the daughter by simply including her in it has no merit. The insinuation that her outfit is provocative is both sexist and sexualizes a minor for wearing clothes that are not inherently sexual and are considered age appropriate. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/girls-against-dress-codes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818841192538554579
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DE0E2D482AD28A65E4E7D4F9C2E7AE532E9FBFF641D4EFA387D1739459D6A73
  • createdAtMillis - 1722520494742
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18188411925385545791DE0E2D482AD28A65E4E7D4F9C2E7AE532E9FBFF641D4EFA387D1739459D6A73