Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 08:16:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 293BF764365B0D89D3623BD167989EAA36F7D66900FC34E89E98C075C7832FFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post makes no factual error nor miss represents the article linked. There is no need for a note, people can read the article for details. Summed up by providing a link to the linked article in the tweet as the sourceā€¦ the context is already there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818773533390258628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 293BF764365B0D89D3623BD167989EAA36F7D66900FC34E89E98C075C7832FFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1722500205749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818773533390258628293BF764365B0D89D3623BD167989EAA36F7D66900FC34E89E98C075C7832FFA