Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 07:23:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F95EE2DFCD84FD1FEDF69C890C882188898FD3DC3A1C24E2F1E3F2DB9D06C07E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The OP text reflects the content of the article. Opinion over right or wrong of the departments expense policy is for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818771511576043591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F95EE2DFCD84FD1FEDF69C890C882188898FD3DC3A1C24E2F1E3F2DB9D06C07E
  • createdAtMillis - 1722583424618
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818771511576043591F95EE2DFCD84FD1FEDF69C890C882188898FD3DC3A1C24E2F1E3F2DB9D06C07E