Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 10:40:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C897F6FA06A121EF4F063F977B7D6B0C2CC560E6CD7676A3B9F857707E3AA64C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The OP text reflects the content of the article. Opinion over right or wrong of the departments expense policy is for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818771511576043591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C897F6FA06A121EF4F063F977B7D6B0C2CC560E6CD7676A3B9F857707E3AA64C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722508849232
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818771511576043591C897F6FA06A121EF4F063F977B7D6B0C2CC560E6CD7676A3B9F857707E3AA64C