Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 08:17:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAD3A1898E910501A9BDA3B8FA69BAA1F7AD6C9463DC2F6C5E3F03E78360BAD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The OP text reflects the content of the article. Opinion over right or wrong of the departments expense policy is for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818771511576043591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAD3A1898E910501A9BDA3B8FA69BAA1F7AD6C9463DC2F6C5E3F03E78360BAD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1722500265941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818771511576043591BAD3A1898E910501A9BDA3B8FA69BAA1F7AD6C9463DC2F6C5E3F03E78360BAD5