Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 16:10:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E5BC30CFD0B6C9800C9EC45F8A37E3B2CDE945E19D19653AC10664427C5C9BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The OP text reflects the content of the article. Opinion over right or wrong of the departments expense policy is for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818771511576043591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E5BC30CFD0B6C9800C9EC45F8A37E3B2CDE945E19D19653AC10664427C5C9BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1722528635101
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18187715115760435915E5BC30CFD0B6C9800C9EC45F8A37E3B2CDE945E19D19653AC10664427C5C9BD