Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 08:30:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The OP text reflects the content of the article. Opinion over right or wrong of the departments expense policy is for the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818771511576043591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186
  • createdAtMillis - 1722501055296
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18187715115760435914FBE2E6C9F0F22A96E1D9D53F2020BAC34A96A9FE5FD6FD1D89AC8247CC02186