Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 15:50:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E16ED132B7F41BE05B99E1F64B4B3BC02DED5F82AD9E127017E92357F88FC6A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Bien que le tweet puisse être controversé, il s’agit là d’une opinion personnelle et la finalité n’est pas identifiée. De plus, LFI n’est pas une autorité publique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818737265083822087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E16ED132B7F41BE05B99E1F64B4B3BC02DED5F82AD9E127017E92357F88FC6A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1722527422941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818737265083822087E16ED132B7F41BE05B99E1F64B4B3BC02DED5F82AD9E127017E92357F88FC6A3