Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:35:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AAC2AED1ED69F4863F868BEB30E1D2EC1C62476A05E4DB2ECEE7E7B53C0AD350
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Bien que le tweet puisse être controversé, il s’agit là d’une opinion personnelle et la finalité n’est pas identifiée. De plus, LFI n’est pas une autorité publique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818737265083822087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AAC2AED1ED69F4863F868BEB30E1D2EC1C62476A05E4DB2ECEE7E7B53C0AD350
  • createdAtMillis - 1722458134032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818737265083822087AAC2AED1ED69F4863F868BEB30E1D2EC1C62476A05E4DB2ECEE7E7B53C0AD350