Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:18:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53AC175358AD4A31E7055A2C9B9BB88C484B81326A7D3E7E5E56FDFF989EA1B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Bien que le tweet puisse être controversé, il s’agit là d’une opinion personnelle et la finalité n’est pas identifiée. De plus, LFI n’est pas une autorité publique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818737265083822087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53AC175358AD4A31E7055A2C9B9BB88C484B81326A7D3E7E5E56FDFF989EA1B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1722457138923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181873726508382208753AC175358AD4A31E7055A2C9B9BB88C484B81326A7D3E7E5E56FDFF989EA1B4