Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:53:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 372BDB92B021004E96F46E39F58ED4D69C1902CAAA2AA28B7DBAC40D68567C69
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Bien que le tweet puisse être controversé, il s’agit là d’une opinion personnelle et la finalité n’est pas identifiée. De plus, LFI n’est pas une autorité publique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818737265083822087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 372BDB92B021004E96F46E39F58ED4D69C1902CAAA2AA28B7DBAC40D68567C69
  • createdAtMillis - 1722459181462
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818737265083822087372BDB92B021004E96F46E39F58ED4D69C1902CAAA2AA28B7DBAC40D68567C69