Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 20:21:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 294B585CF66E22996ABFD5916717246259D09CCA8E85BBD48E7F8CEDC4C6CF6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Bien que le tweet puisse être controversé, il s’agit là d’une opinion personnelle et la finalité n’est pas identifiée. De plus, LFI n’est pas une autorité publique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818737265083822087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 294B585CF66E22996ABFD5916717246259D09CCA8E85BBD48E7F8CEDC4C6CF6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1722457282723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818737265083822087294B585CF66E22996ABFD5916717246259D09CCA8E85BBD48E7F8CEDC4C6CF6D