Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 00:51:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C74113F36289AD3483EBBD2658E0CDB0D5C3F3E1FE618B174FDA16828568C8D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the case were found in favor of the plaintiffs, and the court ordered the removal of the president and VP (unlikely), the speaker of the house would become president, not Trump. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/12/20/fact-check-false-claim-trump-can-reinstated-moore-v-harper-supreme-court/10496451002/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818703962650165363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C74113F36289AD3483EBBD2658E0CDB0D5C3F3E1FE618B174FDA16828568C8D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1722473464688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1818703962650165363C74113F36289AD3483EBBD2658E0CDB0D5C3F3E1FE618B174FDA16828568C8D8