Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 18:01:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 664DBA83A7852C4FE943943267269525A03C035DCCCD39AC94B68510FEE52626
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the case were found in favor of the plaintiffs, and the court ordered the removal of the president and VP (unlikely), the speaker of the house would become president, not Trump. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/12/20/fact-check-false-claim-trump-can-reinstated-moore-v-harper-supreme-court/10496451002/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818703962650165363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 664DBA83A7852C4FE943943267269525A03C035DCCCD39AC94B68510FEE52626
  • createdAtMillis - 1722448893244
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818703962650165363664DBA83A7852C4FE943943267269525A03C035DCCCD39AC94B68510FEE52626