Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-02 09:44:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BC061E2821445A9C2DE8D8FD97EDFA6A0F602C77EC61EE1CD1CA62C7F13AF305
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Proposed note criticizes the tweet for misrepresentation while doing exactly that by using quotation marks around words that were not used and could not reasonably be interpreted as such by anyone who reads it, which is remarkably another hypocritical aspect of the post. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zgq8r2p#zn3scxs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818701178433421585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BC061E2821445A9C2DE8D8FD97EDFA6A0F602C77EC61EE1CD1CA62C7F13AF305
  • createdAtMillis - 1722591879728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818701178433421585BC061E2821445A9C2DE8D8FD97EDFA6A0F602C77EC61EE1CD1CA62C7F13AF305